
Yesterday, Frank Field pointed to this:
Music Industry Puts Troops in the Streets: Quasi-legal squads raid street vendors
This is the RIAA, going after intellectual property. Like a drug raid. And we know how well the drug policy has been working the past 50 years. Success all over the place. It's not the drugs or IP that this is about, it's about policy and tactics, those people in the underground economy, and all the societal problems that come with it. Do we really want to go down this path with IP, or figure out a business model that works with digital distribution, not against it?
Update: Jason Schultz in the comments corrects his misquote in the LA Weekly article. On his blog, he says what he meant was,
...and that he had no idea the reporter was calling about the RIAA doing literal raids. Abe Burmeister responds to the distinction between file sharing and CD trading:
He makes a very good point, and one that parallels what happens with drug prosecution and enforcement, when drugs like crack are punishable with far more restrictive sentences than cocaine, essentially reflecting who uses them and their socio-economic status. Course, the poor-folk get the short end of the stick. Though I would argue that there are also major organizations devoted to piracy, not just the small time folks noted in the article. I would disagree that EFF can't be bothered to defend CD distribution of copied music. I think instead EFF has drawn a legal line between these two types of music sharing, and in fact, before the first lawsuits against file sharers, they suggested that the RIAA should sue them. But I think a position they would have the most integrity with is that suing or raiding is untenable, that society would benefit overall from decriminalizing this behavior in favor of a business model that supports file sharing, makes artists money, no matter who does the distribution and by what method. Pushing more people, especially poor people with little resources, further into the criminal justice system, further into the underground economy, is a mistake those people can never recover from. There is no growth or advancement for a person in the underground economy, there is almost no chance to educate or buy a house or make a stake in society for themselves, their children or improve their neighborhoods. It's bad public policy and should not be supported at all.
Posted by Mary Hodder at January 15, 2004 06:39 PMHey Mary,
Just in case any of your readers are wondering, there's a quote in this story from me appearing to endorse the raids that's actually a MISQUOTE. I've posted a full response to the story and the quote here. But suffice it to say that I had no idea the RIAA was conducting these raids with their own rent-a-cops, vigilante-style, instead of the typical trade investigations that then go to the police for warrant-based arrests.
Posted by: Jason Schultz on January 16, 2004 01:59 AMI was going to write something serious about the risks involved with private police...but do you remember back in the Clinton years when the NRA painted the federal government (BATF) as "jack-booted thugs." That seemed to work for the guys trying to take away guns...maybe it will work against these guys.
Posted by: Chris on January 18, 2004 05:05 PM